Общественное участие в городском развитии: на примере Архангельской области

  • Илья Федорович Верещагин Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет, Архангельск, Россия
  • Инга Михайловна Зашихина Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Архангельск, Россия
  • Мария Вадимовна Малыгина Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Архангельск, Россия
Ключевые слова: градостроительство, развитие города, комфортная жизнь, муниципальное управление, социальная интеграция, участие общественности, процесс принятия решений, Архангельская область

Аннотация

В современном градостроительстве на смену технократическим подходам приходит интегрированное городское развитие. С точки зрения управления городской дизайн — сложный вопрос, в котором участвует большое количество заинтересованных сторон. Прежде всего современное развитие города требует, чтобы жители стали активными участниками процесса принятия решений. Анализируется процесс градостроительства в Архангельской области, Северо-Запад России. Градостроительная политика правительства Архангельской области претерпевает серьезные трансформации. Сообщество начало переговорный процесс с муниципальным правительством, дабы обеспечить жителям право голоса в городском планировании. Однако процесс общения между администрацией и гражданами довольно неоднозначен. С одной стороны, каналы связи определены и функционируют. Граждане используют интернет и СМИ, чтобы узнавать о планах и действиях властей. Повышение общественной осведомленности в регионе послужило триггером первых коллективных действий в области градостроительства. С другой стороны, многое еще предстоит сделать. Исследование основано на фактических данных открытых источников и анализе результатов опроса жителей Архангельской области. Результаты опроса позволяют определить, каким образом сообщество может повлиять на планирование городского пространства, а также на взаимоотношения между администрацией и жителями городов по этому по- воду. Хотя широкое вовлечение общественности требует значительного времени и усилий, очевидно, что определенные изменения уже начались: имидж малой родины стал центром внимания жителей Архангельской области.

Литература

Akhiezer A.S. (1989) Kachestvo gorodskoj sredy kak faktor intensifikacii proizvodstva [The quality of the urban environment as a factor in the intensification of progress]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.13.8.40882.

Akimova O.E. (2019) Unikalnyye preimushchestva primeneniya kontseptsii «umnyy gorod» v kontekste razvitiya sovremennogo ekonomiko-strategicheskogo planirovaniya [Unique Advantages of the Smart City Concept in the Context of Development of the Modern Economic-Strategic Planning]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative economy], 13(8): 1521–1528 (in Russian).

Alizadeh T. (2018) Crowdsourced Smart Cities versus Corporate Smart Cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755.

Almusaed A., Almssad, A. (2020). City Phenomenon between Urban Structure and Composition. Sustainability in Urban Planning and Design. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90443.

Aurigi A., Odendaal N. (2020) From “Smart in the Box” to “Smart in the City”: Rethinking the Socially Sustainable Smart City in Context. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1-2): 55-70 https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1704.

Bajracharya B., Khan S. (2019) Urban Governance in Australia: A Case Study of Brisbane City. New Urban Agenda in Asia-Pacific, 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6709-08.

Coelho V.N., Oliveira T.A., Tavares W., Coelho I.M. (2021) Smart Accounts for Decentralized Governance on Smart Cities. Smart Cities, 4(2): 881–893. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020045.

Comunian R. (2011) Rethinking the Creative City: The Role of Complexity, Networks and Interactions in the Urban Creative Economy. Urban Studies, 48(6): 1157–1179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43082003.

Drannikova N., Zashihina I. (2018) Local identity and self-identity of residents of northern Russian cities of Arkhangelsk and Severodvinski. SHS Web of Conferences, 50, 01045. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/2018500104.

Einstein K. L. (2019) The Privileged Few: How Exclusionary Zoning Amplifies the Advantaged and Blocks New Housing—and What We Can Do About It. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1): 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419884644.

Fincher R., Pardy M., Shaw K. (2016) Place-making or place-masking? The everyday political economy of “making place”. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4): 516–536.

Fu Y., Ma W. (2020) Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation. Sustainability, 12(2), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020617.

Gaikova L.V. (2013) Potrebitel’skoe zonirovanie pri formirovanii gorodskih obshchestvennyh prostranstv [Consumer zoning in the formation of urban public spaces]. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 4: 33–38 (in Russian).

Galič M., Schuilenburg M. (2020) Reclaiming the Smart City: Toward a New Right to the City. Handbook of Smart Cities, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15145-459-1.

Gamurak A.V. (2019) Novyy format obshchestvennyh psostranstv skvoz’ prizmy souchastvuyushchego proektirovaniya [New format of public spaces through the prism of participatory design]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya Tsentral’noj Rossii [The humanities’ research of Central Russia], 2(11) (in Russian).

Glazychev V.L. (2017) Urbanistics. Moscow: KDU.

Haidine A., El Hassani S., Aqqal A., El Hannani A. (2016) The Role of Communication Technologies in Building Future Smart Cities. Smart Cities Technologies. https://doi.org/10.5772/64732.

Harris K.E. (2015) Because We Can Doesn’t Mean We Should and if We Do. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(3): 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242415575423.

Hassan G.F., El Hefnawi A., El Refaie M. (2011) Efficiency of participation in planning. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 50(2): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2011.03.004.

Healey P. (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. USA and Canada: Routledge: 13–23.

Holubava V. (2019) Smart Cities. In: Sergi B.S. (ed.) Modeling Economic Growth in Contemporary Belarus (Entrepreneurship and Global Economic Growth). Bingley: Emerald: 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-695-720191015.

Horelli L. (2013) New Approaches to Urban Planning. Insights from Participatory Communities. Helsinki: Aalto University.

Huang K., Luo W., Zhang W., Li J. (2021) Characteristics and Problems of Smart City Development in China. Smart Cities, 4(4): 1403-1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4040074.

Hui E.C.M., Chen T., Lang W., Ou Y. (2021) Urban community regeneration and community vitality revitalization through participatory planning in China. Cities, 110, [103072]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103072.

Husár M., Ondrejička V., Varış S. C. (2017) Smart Cities and the Idea of Smartness in Urban Development — A Critical Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245, 082008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/245/8/082008.

Jo J.H., Sharma P.K., Sicato J.C.S., Park J.H. (2019) Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Smart City Network Security: Issues, Challenges, and Countermeasures. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 15(4): 765–784. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.03.0124.

Karvonen A., Cook M., Haarstad H. (2020) Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics. Urban Planning, 5(1): 65–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2936.

Kennell J. (2010) Symbolic Cities: cultural regeneration, branding and representation in urban development. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Kenny N. (2014) The Feel of the City: Experiences of Urban Transformation. University of Toronto Press: 3–23.

Khmelnitskaya M., Ihalainen E. (2021) Urban Governance in Russia: The Case of Moscow Territorial Development and Housing Renovation. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(6): 1149–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1937.

Kirkhaug T.R. (2016) Communication in Urban Planning. How quality of communication can facilitate constructive citizen participation. URL: https://www.ntnu.edu/documents/139799/1273574286/TPD4505.Trine.Kirkhaug.pdf/b5be429aa89f-459f-993f-4489d9f0f7f4.

Lam P.T.I., Ma R. (2018) Potential pitfalls in the development of smart cities and mitigation measures: An exploratory study. Cities, 91: 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.0.

Lamsal M. (2012) The structuration approach of Anthony Giddens. Himalayan Journal of Sociology & Anthropology, 5: 111-122. https://doi.org/10.3126/hjsa.v5i0.7043.

Lee J.Y. (2003) Theory and application of urban governance: The case of Seoul. Journal of Urban Technology, 10(2): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630730320001397.

Ma R., Lam P.T., Leung C.K. (2018) Potential pitfalls of smart city development: A study on parking mobile applications (apps) in Hong Kong. Telematics Informatics, 35: 1580-1592.

Mateo-Babiano I., Lee G. (2020) People in Place: Placemaking Fundamentals. In: Hes D., Hernandez-Santin C. (eds.) Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan: 15–38.

McKenna H. (2020). Human-Smart Environment Interactions in Smart Cities: Exploring Dimensionalities of Smartness. Future Internet, 12(5): 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12050079.

Misoczky M. C., Oliveira C. M. de. (2018) The city and the urban as spaces of capital and social struggle: notes on Henri Lefebvre’s enduring contributions. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(6): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220170122.

Mondschein A., Zhang Z., El Khafif M. (2019) Community-Centered Urban Sensing. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 8(4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2019100101.

Morris A., Zuo J., Wang Y., Wang J. (2018) Readiness for sustainable community: A case study of Green Star Communities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173: 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.

Mumford L. (2001) What is city. In: Legates R.T., Stout F. (eds.) The City Reader. Routledge.

Mundada M.R., Mukkamala R.R. (2020) Smart Cities for Sustainability — An Analytical Perspective. Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4): 770–775.

Nicholls L., Maller C., Phelan K. (2016) Planning for community: understanding diversity in resident experiences and expectations of social connections in a new urban fringe housing estate, Australia. Community, Work & Family, 20(4): 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2016.118.

Nursey-Bray M. (2020) Community Engagement: What Is It? In: Hes D., Hernandez-Santin C. (eds.) Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan: 83–106.

Paskaleva K., Evans J., Watson K. (2021) Co-producing smart cities: A Quadruple Helix approach to assessment. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(4): 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211016037.

Purcell M. (2014) Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the City. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034.

Radina N.K. (2015) Gorod v prostranstve i vremeni: problemy territorialnoy identichnosti v kontekste socialno-ekonomicheskich izmeneniy [The City in Space and Time: Problems of Territorial Identity in the Context of Socio-Economic Changes]. Nizhnij Novgorod: DEKOM: 8-26 (in Russian).

Reyes Plata J.A. (2019) Urban Planning, Urban Design, and the Creation of Public Goods. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A., Brandli L., Özuyar P., Wall T. (eds.) Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_82-1.

Sabatini-Marques J., Yigitcanlar T., Schreiner T., Wittmann T., Sotto D., Inkinen T. (2020) Strategizing Smart, Sustainable, and Knowledge-Based Development of Cities: Insights from Florianópolis, Brazil. Sustainability, 12(21), 8859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218859.

Terentyev E. A. (2015) Toponimicheskij aktivizm i pravo na gorod sociologicheskie zametki [Toponymic activism and the “Right to the city”: sociological notes]. Vestnik tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science], 1(29): 194–202 (in Russian).

Tomičić-Pupek K., Pihir I., Tomičić Furjan M. (2019) Smart city initiatives in the context of digital transformation. Management, 24(1): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.24.1.3.

Tonnelat S. (2010) The Sociology of Urban Public Spaces. In: Wang H., Say M., Zhai G. (eds.) Territorial Evolution and Planning Solution: Experiences from China and France, Paris. Atlantis Press: 84–92.

Trutnev E.K. (2003) Diskussionny`e voprosy` razvitiya gradostroitel`nogo zakonodatel`stva [Debatable issues of development of town-planning legislation]. Imushhestvennyye otnosheniya v RF [Property relations in the Russian Federation], 8: 3–12 (in Russian).

Unlu-Yucesoy E. (2016) Neighbourhood and Belonging: Turkish Immigrant Women Constructing the Everyday Public Space in Fenster T., Yacobi H. (eds.) Remembering, Forgetting and City Builders. London and New York: Routledge.

Vasilenko I., Volodenkov S., Gadzhiev K., Kovalenko V., Kochetkov A., Lulko A., Soloviev A. (2020) «Umny`j gorod» kak social`no-politicheskij proekt: kakim on budet v Rossii? [“Smart City” as a socio-political project: what will it be like in Russia?]. Vlast [Power], 28(51) (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i1.7042.

Vershinina I.A., Volkova L.V. (2020) Smart Cities: Challenges and Opportunities. Espacios. 41(15): 23.

Whittemore A.H. (2020) Exclusionary Zoning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1828.

Wiryomartono B. (2020) Livability and Sustainability of Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wolfrum S., Janson A. (2019) The City as Architecture. Berlin, Boston: Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035618051.

Yigitcanlar T. (2015) Smart cities: an effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.101.

Yigitcanlar T., Han H., Kamruzzaman M., Ioppolo G., Sabatini-Marques J. (2019) The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build? Land Use Policy, 88, 104187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.

Zieleniec A. (2018) Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre. Urban Planning, 3(3): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i3.1343.

Internet Sources

Arkhangelskije vlasti predstavili novyy genplan i strategiyu “Arkhangelsk — gorod vozmozhnostej dlya kazhdogo” [Arkhangelsk authorities introduced a new general plan and strategy “Arkhangelsk — a city of opportunities for everyone”].

BezFormata. [https://arhangelsk.bezformata.com/listnews/arhangelskie-vlastipredstavili-novij/81422030/] (accessed: 01.02.2021) (in Russian).

Gradostroitel’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (s izmeneniyami na 30 dekabrya 2020 goda) [Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation (as amended on December 30, 2020)]. Elektronnyj fond pravovoj i normativno-tekhnicheskoj dokumentacii. [http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gradostroitelnyj-kodeks-rf-grk-rf] (accessed: 02/01/2021) (in Russian).

Official Site of Emden City. Emden. [https://www.emden.de/] (accessed: 01.02.2021) (in Russian).

V dukhe Arhangelska: Vmesto skvera delovoj centr [In the spirit of Arkhangelsk: Instead of a public garden, a business center]. Informacionnoe agentstvo “Severnye novosti” [https://newsnord.ru/v-duhe-arhangelska-vmesto-skvera-delovoj-czentr/] (accessed: 01.02.2021) (in Russian).

Vsyo, chto nuzhno znat’ pro “Kvartal 100”: “Akvilon Invest” rasskazal pro bol’shoj proekt v Severodvinske [Everything you need to know about “Kvartal 100”: “Akvilon Invest” spoke about a large project in Severodvinsk]. Informacionnoe agentstvo “29.ru” [https://29.ru/text/realty/2019/12/06/66386575/] (accessed: 02/01/2021) (in Russian).

“Zarus’e” zapyatnano. Na chto potratili dengi zhitelej Arkhangelska? [“Zarusie” is tarnished. What did the residents of Arkhangelsk spend money on?]. Argumenty I Fakty. Arkhangelsk. [https://arh.aif.ru/culture/events/zaruse_zapyatnano_na_chto_potratili_dengi_zhiteley_arhangelska] (accessed: 01.02.2021) (in Russian).

Zhiteli pereulka Vodnikov zapisali obrashchenie k gubernatoru na fone sgorevshego doma [Residents of Vodnikov Lane recorded an appeal to the governor against the background of a burnt house]. Setevoe izdanie “News29.ru” [https://www.news29.ru/novosti/obschestvo/Zhiteli_pereulka_Vodnikov_zapisali_obraschenie_k_gubernatoru_na_fone_sgorevshego_doma/90954] (accessed: 01.02.2021) (in Russian).

Опубликован
2023-03-31
Как цитировать
Верещагин, И. Ф., Зашихина, И. М., & Малыгина, М. В. (2023). Общественное участие в городском развитии: на примере Архангельской области. ЖУРНАЛ СОЦИОЛОГИИ И СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ АНТРОПОЛОГИИ, 26(1), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2023.26.1.6